High Sand Lows Report
  • Investing
  • Latest News
  • Editor’s Pick
  • Economy
  • Investing
  • Latest News
  • Editor’s Pick
  • Economy
No Result
View All Result
High Sand Lows Report
No Result
View All Result
Home Latest News

Supreme Court lets Trump’s ‘wrecking ball’ federal job cuts proceed while legal fight continues

by
July 8, 2025
in Latest News
0
Supreme Court lets Trump’s ‘wrecking ball’ federal job cuts proceed while legal fight continues
0
SHARES
1
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

The Supreme Court on Tuesday allowed the Trump administration to move forward, at least for now, with plans to implement large-scale cuts to the federal workforce, issuing a stay that lifts a lower court’s injunction against the administration’s executive order.

In a 6–3 decision, the justices granted the emergency request filed by the White House last week, clearing the way for Executive Order No. 14210 to take effect while legal challenges play out in the Ninth Circuit and potentially the high court.

The order directs federal agencies to carry out sweeping reductions in force (RIFs) and agency reorganizations. 

It has been described by administration officials as a lawful effort to ‘streamline government and eliminate waste.’ Critics, including labor unions, local governments and nonprofit organizations, argue the president is unlawfully bypassing Congress to dismantle major parts of the federal government.

A majority on the Court stressed that it was not ruling on the legality of specific agency cuts, only the executive order itself.

‘Because the Government is likely to succeed on its argument that the Executive Order and Memorandum are lawful—and because the other factors bearing on whether to grant a stay are satisfied—we grant the application,’ the Court wrote. ‘We express no view on the legality of any Agency RIF and Reorganization Plan produced or approved pursuant to the Executive Order and Memorandum. The District Court enjoined further implementation or approval of the plans based on its view about the illegality of the Executive Order and Memorandum, not on any assessment of the plans themselves. Those plans are not before this Court.’

The district court in California had blocked the order in May, calling it an overreach. But the Supreme Court’s unsigned decision on Tuesday set aside that injunction, pending appeal. The majority said the government is ‘likely to succeed’ in defending the legality of the order.

Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson dissented forcefully, writing that ‘this Court sees fit to step in now and release the President’s wrecking ball at the outset of this litigation.’ She warned that the executive action represents a ‘structural overhaul that usurps Congress’s policymaking prerogatives’ and accused the majority of acting prematurely in an emergency posture without fully understanding the facts.

‘This unilateral decision to ‘transform’ the Federal Government was quickly challenged in federal court,’ she wrote. ‘The District Judge thoroughly examined the evidence, considered applicable law, and made a reasoned determination that Executive Branch officials should be enjoined from implementing the mandated restructuring… But that temporary, practical, harm-reducing preservation of the status quo was no match for this Court’s demonstrated enthusiasm for greenlighting this President’s legally dubious actions in an emergency posture.’

The executive order, issued in February, instructed agencies to prepare immediate plans for reorganizations and workforce reductions, including eliminating roles deemed ‘non-critical’ or ‘not statutorily mandated.’ The administration says it is a necessary response to bloated government and outdated structures, claiming the injunction was forcing agencies to retain ‘thousands of employees whose continuance in federal service… is not in the government and public interest.’

Labor unions and state officials opposing the plan say it goes beyond normal workforce management and could gut services across multiple agencies. They point to proposed cuts of over 50% at the Department of Energy, and nearly 90% at the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.

The case is Trump v. American Federation of Government Employees.

‘Today’s U.S. Supreme Court ruling is another definitive victory for the President and his administration,’ wrote White House principal deputy press secretary Harrison Fields in an email to Fox News Digital. ‘It clearly rebukes the continued assaults on the President’s constitutionally authorized executive powers by leftist judges who are trying to prevent the President from achieving government efficiency across the federal government.’

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS
Previous Post

TikToker knocks Harris’ ‘weird’ take on never released interview: ‘Not good’

Next Post

Waymo offers teen accounts for driverless rides

Next Post
Waymo offers teen accounts for driverless rides

Waymo offers teen accounts for driverless rides

  • Trending
  • Comments
  • Latest
Adani, Ambani news units sue OpenAI over copyright, Reuters reports

Adani, Ambani news units sue OpenAI over copyright, Reuters reports

January 29, 2025
BASF results down on impairments, restructuring

BASF results down on impairments, restructuring

January 29, 2025
UMG shares rally after new multi-year pact with Spotify

UMG shares rally after new multi-year pact with Spotify

January 29, 2025
China central bank conducts 1.7 trln yuan of outright reverse repos in Jan

China central bank conducts 1.7 trln yuan of outright reverse repos in Jan

January 29, 2025
Tariff case pits Cato Institute against Trump over ‘unlimited’ executive power under emergency law

Tariff case pits Cato Institute against Trump over ‘unlimited’ executive power under emergency law

0
British Land stock drops following stake sale

British Land stock drops following stake sale

0
Italy’s MPS shares fall ahead of Mediobanca board meeting on bid

Italy’s MPS shares fall ahead of Mediobanca board meeting on bid

0
Fuji Media, rocked by sexual misconduct allegations, says executives to resign

Fuji Media, rocked by sexual misconduct allegations, says executives to resign

0
Tariff case pits Cato Institute against Trump over ‘unlimited’ executive power under emergency law

Tariff case pits Cato Institute against Trump over ‘unlimited’ executive power under emergency law

July 9, 2025
Biden’s strange use of teleprompter in donor’s home infuriated supporters, dashed expectations

Biden’s strange use of teleprompter in donor’s home infuriated supporters, dashed expectations

July 9, 2025
Waymo offers teen accounts for driverless rides

Waymo offers teen accounts for driverless rides

July 8, 2025
Supreme Court lets Trump’s ‘wrecking ball’ federal job cuts proceed while legal fight continues

Supreme Court lets Trump’s ‘wrecking ball’ federal job cuts proceed while legal fight continues

July 8, 2025

    Stay updated with the latest news, exclusive offers, and special promotions. Sign up now and be the first to know! As a member, you'll receive curated content, insider tips, and invitations to exclusive events. Don't miss out on being part of something special.


    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Top News

    Tariff case pits Cato Institute against Trump over ‘unlimited’ executive power under emergency law

    Tariff case pits Cato Institute against Trump over ‘unlimited’ executive power under emergency law

    July 9, 2025
    Biden’s strange use of teleprompter in donor’s home infuriated supporters, dashed expectations

    Biden’s strange use of teleprompter in donor’s home infuriated supporters, dashed expectations

    July 9, 2025

    Latest News

    • Tariff case pits Cato Institute against Trump over ‘unlimited’ executive power under emergency law
    • Biden’s strange use of teleprompter in donor’s home infuriated supporters, dashed expectations
    • Waymo offers teen accounts for driverless rides
    • About us
    • Contact us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions
    • About us
    • Contact us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Copyright © 2025 Highsandlowsreport.com All Rights Reserved.

    No Result
    View All Result
    • Investing
    • Latest News
    • Editor’s Pick
    • Economy

    Copyright © 2025 Highsandlowsreport.com All Rights Reserved.